<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1448 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458360</link>
    <description>Delhi HC granted bail to accused in NDPS case involving commercial quantity of cannabis. Court found non-compliance with Section 52A sampling procedure, significant trial delay with only 2 of 22 witnesses examined since June 2021 custody, and three-month delay in sample drawing. Despite stringent Section 37 NDPS Act conditions, HC held procedural errors and prolonged custody without trial progress entitled accused to bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1448 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458360</link>
      <description>Delhi HC granted bail to accused in NDPS case involving commercial quantity of cannabis. Court found non-compliance with Section 52A sampling procedure, significant trial delay with only 2 of 22 witnesses examined since June 2021 custody, and three-month delay in sample drawing. Despite stringent Section 37 NDPS Act conditions, HC held procedural errors and prolonged custody without trial progress entitled accused to bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>