<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1389 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458364</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the appellant&#039;s conviction and sentence under the NDPS Act due to non-compliance with statutory sampling procedures. The Court found that the samples were improperly drawn immediately after seizure, not in the presence of a Magistrate as required, thus failing to prove the prosecution&#039;s case beyond a reasonable doubt. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:36:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1389 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458364</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the appellant&#039;s conviction and sentence under the NDPS Act due to non-compliance with statutory sampling procedures. The Court found that the samples were improperly drawn immediately after seizure, not in the presence of a Magistrate as required, thus failing to prove the prosecution&#039;s case beyond a reasonable doubt. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>