https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458365 Pendency of an anticipatory bail application, without any interim protection, does not bar the trial court from proceeding with proclamation and related coercive steps under sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure after an unexecuted warrant. Mere filing of such an application is not appearance before the court and cannot stall lawful process. Accused persons who continue to remain absent despite summons, warrants and proclamation, and who do not take timely steps to secure regular bail or challenge the coercive process, may be treated as avoiding the court; anticipatory bail is not available to them as a matter of right. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:36:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458365 Pendency of an anticipatory bail application, without any interim protection, does not bar the trial court from proceeding with proclamation and related coercive steps under sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure after an unexecuted warrant. Mere filing of such an application is not appearance before the court and cannot stall lawful process. Accused persons who continue to remain absent despite summons, warrants and proclamation, and who do not take timely steps to secure regular bail or challenge the coercive process, may be treated as avoiding the court; anticipatory bail is not available to them as a matter of right. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458365