<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1364 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458365</link>
    <description>SC dismissed appeal challenging HC&#039;s rejection of anticipatory bail application. Appellants consistently failed to appear before trial court despite service of summons, bailable warrants, and non-bailable warrants. They withdrew bail-cum-surrender application fearing arrest and did not apply for regular bail after non-bailable warrants were issued. Court held appellants were absconding as they had knowledge of pending warrants. Their conduct constituted defiance of lawful court orders and attempt to delay proceedings. HC was justified in rejecting anticipatory bail without considering merits due to proclamation under Section 82 Cr.PC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1364 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458365</link>
      <description>SC dismissed appeal challenging HC&#039;s rejection of anticipatory bail application. Appellants consistently failed to appear before trial court despite service of summons, bailable warrants, and non-bailable warrants. They withdrew bail-cum-surrender application fearing arrest and did not apply for regular bail after non-bailable warrants were issued. Court held appellants were absconding as they had knowledge of pending warrants. Their conduct constituted defiance of lawful court orders and attempt to delay proceedings. HC was justified in rejecting anticipatory bail without considering merits due to proclamation under Section 82 Cr.PC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>