<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1479 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458372</link>
    <description>Reassessment notices must be supported by valid sanction under the correct clause before they can sustain further proceedings. Here, sanction was obtained under the wrong clause of Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, so it was treated as invalid; the notice founded on that sanction could not survive, and the consequential assessment orders also fell with it. The notices and all resulting orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1479 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458372</link>
      <description>Reassessment notices must be supported by valid sanction under the correct clause before they can sustain further proceedings. Here, sanction was obtained under the wrong clause of Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, so it was treated as invalid; the notice founded on that sanction could not survive, and the consequential assessment orders also fell with it. The notices and all resulting orders were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>