<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=5622</link>
    <description>The doctrine of unjust enrichment imposes restitution where a defendant has received and retained a benefit that, in justice and equity, belongs to another. Its elements are: enrichment by receipt of a benefit, enrichment at the claimant&#039;s expense, and that it would be unjust to permit retention. Liability may arise even if the recipient was not a wrongdoer, and courts have broad powers to grant restitution to prevent inequitable retention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 17:11:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=5622</link>
      <description>The doctrine of unjust enrichment imposes restitution where a defendant has received and retained a benefit that, in justice and equity, belongs to another. Its elements are: enrichment by receipt of a benefit, enrichment at the claimant&#039;s expense, and that it would be unjust to permit retention. Liability may arise even if the recipient was not a wrongdoer, and courts have broad powers to grant restitution to prevent inequitable retention.</description>
      <category>Manuals</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 17:11:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/manuals?id=5622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>