<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 29 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38983</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could apply to assessments originally made under section 23(3) of the 1922 Act, because penalty proceedings for offences connected with earlier assessments were not barred by the later statute. However, the revenue still had to prove concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars on the facts as a whole. Mere survival of some additions in the quantum appeal did not, by itself, establish concealment or satisfy that burden. The Tribunal&#039;s view that partial confirmation of additions was insufficient to justify penalty was therefore accepted on the concealment issue, while the applicability of penalty provisions in principle was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:48:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 29 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38983</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could apply to assessments originally made under section 23(3) of the 1922 Act, because penalty proceedings for offences connected with earlier assessments were not barred by the later statute. However, the revenue still had to prove concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars on the facts as a whole. Mere survival of some additions in the quantum appeal did not, by itself, establish concealment or satisfy that burden. The Tribunal&#039;s view that partial confirmation of additions was insufficient to justify penalty was therefore accepted on the concealment issue, while the applicability of penalty provisions in principle was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>