<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (5) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38978</link>
    <description>Renewal of registration under section 184(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 requires that the partnership instrument continue to evidence the partners&#039; shares with sufficient certainty and that there be no change in the constitution of the firm or in those shares. Where a partner who had been a minor attains majority and the deed does not show how losses are to be apportioned after that change, the earlier loss-sharing arrangement cannot be presumed to continue. On the facts, the partnership deed did not disclose the loss-sharing basis after the minor became a major, so the requisite certainty for continued registration was absent and renewal was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (5) TMI 12 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38978</link>
      <description>Renewal of registration under section 184(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 requires that the partnership instrument continue to evidence the partners&#039; shares with sufficient certainty and that there be no change in the constitution of the firm or in those shares. Where a partner who had been a minor attains majority and the deed does not show how losses are to be apportioned after that change, the earlier loss-sharing arrangement cannot be presumed to continue. On the facts, the partnership deed did not disclose the loss-sharing basis after the minor became a major, so the requisite certainty for continued registration was absent and renewal was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>