<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 28 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38977</link>
    <description>The court held that the royalty payments made by the assessee were allowable as revenue expenditure. The payments were directly related to the quantity of petroleum extracted and sold, qualifying them as revenue expenditure despite the enduring nature of the asset obtained under the lease. The court&#039;s decision aligned with the principles established in the Gotan Lime Syndicate case, determining that the royalty payments were revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:11:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 28 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38977</link>
      <description>The court held that the royalty payments made by the assessee were allowable as revenue expenditure. The payments were directly related to the quantity of petroleum extracted and sold, qualifying them as revenue expenditure despite the enduring nature of the asset obtained under the lease. The court&#039;s decision aligned with the principles established in the Gotan Lime Syndicate case, determining that the royalty payments were revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>