<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delhi Gymkhana Club&#039;s Management Replaced by Government Committee for Violations; Corrective Actions Due by March 2025.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82497</link>
    <description>The Delhi Gymkhana Club, incorporated u/s 26(1) of the Companies Act, 1913, was formed to promote sports and other useful objects in public interest. The Central Government filed an application u/ss 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging the club&#039;s affairs were conducted prejudicially to public interest. The NCLT, based on inspection reports highlighting violations and minimal sports expenditure, superseded the management by appointing a 15-member committee nominated by the Central Government. The NCLAT upheld the NCLT&#039;s order, finding sufficient material for the Central Government&#039;s opinion u/s 241(2) that the club&#039;s affairs were prejudicial to public interest. However, to bring an end to the matters complained of, the NCLAT directed.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:19:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:19:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Delhi Gymkhana Club&#039;s Management Replaced by Government Committee for Violations; Corrective Actions Due by March 2025.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82497</link>
      <description>The Delhi Gymkhana Club, incorporated u/s 26(1) of the Companies Act, 1913, was formed to promote sports and other useful objects in public interest. The Central Government filed an application u/ss 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013, alleging the club&#039;s affairs were conducted prejudicially to public interest. The NCLT, based on inspection reports highlighting violations and minimal sports expenditure, superseded the management by appointing a 15-member committee nominated by the Central Government. The NCLAT upheld the NCLT&#039;s order, finding sufficient material for the Central Government&#039;s opinion u/s 241(2) that the club&#039;s affairs were prejudicial to public interest. However, to bring an end to the matters complained of, the NCLAT directed.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:19:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>