<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760524</link>
    <description>Contractual disputes arising during the subsistence of a lease, including renewal and revision of storage charges, remained referable to arbitration because the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 governs eviction from unauthorised occupation and does not displace disputes based on interpretation of the agreement. At the Section 11 stage, the referral court&#039;s role is confined to a prima facie check on the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, not a merits review. The arbitration clause covered disputes arising out of or touching the agreement, so appointment of an arbitrator was within jurisdiction and the arbitral process was allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760524</link>
      <description>Contractual disputes arising during the subsistence of a lease, including renewal and revision of storage charges, remained referable to arbitration because the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 governs eviction from unauthorised occupation and does not displace disputes based on interpretation of the agreement. At the Section 11 stage, the referral court&#039;s role is confined to a prima facie check on the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, not a merits review. The arbitration clause covered disputes arising out of or touching the agreement, so appointment of an arbitrator was within jurisdiction and the arbitral process was allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>