<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760524</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed an appeal challenging HC&#039;s appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appellant argued Public Premises Act, 1971 overrides arbitration proceedings. SC held disputes regarding lease renewal rights and storage charge revisions during contract subsistence (2012-2015) arose from contractual agreement terms, not public premises occupation. Public Premises Act neither barred nor overlapped with arbitration proceedings scope. Disputes clearly fell within arbitration clause coverage. Appeal dismissed with Rs. 50,000 costs imposed on appellant for unnecessary litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760524</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed an appeal challenging HC&#039;s appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Appellant argued Public Premises Act, 1971 overrides arbitration proceedings. SC held disputes regarding lease renewal rights and storage charge revisions during contract subsistence (2012-2015) arose from contractual agreement terms, not public premises occupation. Public Premises Act neither barred nor overlapped with arbitration proceedings scope. Disputes clearly fell within arbitration clause coverage. Appeal dismissed with Rs. 50,000 costs imposed on appellant for unnecessary litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>