https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760526 Input tax credit was challenged on the ground that the underlying transactions were allegedly bogus and the suppliers non-existent. The SC applied the ratio of an earlier precedent on claims without actual transactions and, there being no contest from the respondent, treated that principle as governing the facts before it. On that basis, the credit claim was not accepted and the appeal was disposed of in line with the earlier judgment. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:20:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760526 Input tax credit was challenged on the ground that the underlying transactions were allegedly bogus and the suppliers non-existent. The SC applied the ratio of an earlier precedent on claims without actual transactions and, there being no contest from the respondent, treated that principle as governing the facts before it. On that basis, the credit claim was not accepted and the appeal was disposed of in line with the earlier judgment. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Mon, 14 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760526