<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1140 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760541</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to insufficient evidence of their involvement in alleged license manipulation. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, deleting the penalty. Appeals by Revenue were dismissed on monetary grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:19:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1140 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760541</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai set aside the penalty imposed on the appellants under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to insufficient evidence of their involvement in alleged license manipulation. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, deleting the penalty. Appeals by Revenue were dismissed on monetary grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>