<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1141 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760542</link>
    <description>Exemption under the Advance Authorisation scheme was considered in relation to the alleged breach of the pre-import condition for IGST liability, interest, redemption fine and penalty. The note states that the decisive question was whether the imported inputs were actually used in manufacture of export goods and whether export obligation was substantively met. A mere comparison of bill of entry and shipping bill dates was treated as insufficient where the record showed that most imports preceded exports and, in the remaining cases, IGST had been paid after re-assessment or the export obligation had otherwise been completed. On that footing, confiscation, redemption fine, interest and penalty were also treated as unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 08:19:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1141 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760542</link>
      <description>Exemption under the Advance Authorisation scheme was considered in relation to the alleged breach of the pre-import condition for IGST liability, interest, redemption fine and penalty. The note states that the decisive question was whether the imported inputs were actually used in manufacture of export goods and whether export obligation was substantively met. A mere comparison of bill of entry and shipping bill dates was treated as insufficient where the record showed that most imports preceded exports and, in the remaining cases, IGST had been paid after re-assessment or the export obligation had otherwise been completed. On that footing, confiscation, redemption fine, interest and penalty were also treated as unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>