<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1163 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760564</link>
    <description>A bail condition requiring the accused to furnish a bank guarantee as a pre-condition for release or continuance of bail is not legally sustainable. Relying on prior Supreme Court decisions, the Karnataka High Court held that the lower court&#039;s direction to furnish a bank guarantee of Rs. 50 lakhs was illegal and set it aside. The Court observed that, although such a monetary guarantee cannot be insisted upon, other legally permissible bail conditions may continue to operate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1163 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760564</link>
      <description>A bail condition requiring the accused to furnish a bank guarantee as a pre-condition for release or continuance of bail is not legally sustainable. Relying on prior Supreme Court decisions, the Karnataka High Court held that the lower court&#039;s direction to furnish a bank guarantee of Rs. 50 lakhs was illegal and set it aside. The Court observed that, although such a monetary guarantee cannot be insisted upon, other legally permissible bail conditions may continue to operate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>