<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1288 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458330</link>
    <description>In disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act, the Delhi HC gave substantial weight to the statutory disciplinary bodies&#039; findings that the respondent chartered accountant committed other misconduct in two references. The first involved misuse of signed papers, forgery of signatures, fabricated company resolutions, and fictitious addresses; the second involved a fraudulent public issue, false and misleading disclosures, fictitious directors, and failure to verify prospectus disclosures. Finding that the process complied with natural justice and that the conclusions were proportionate to the misconduct, the Court accepted the recommendation of removal from membership for five years in each matter, with the two periods to run separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1288 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458330</link>
      <description>In disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act, the Delhi HC gave substantial weight to the statutory disciplinary bodies&#039; findings that the respondent chartered accountant committed other misconduct in two references. The first involved misuse of signed papers, forgery of signatures, fabricated company resolutions, and fictitious addresses; the second involved a fraudulent public issue, false and misleading disclosures, fictitious directors, and failure to verify prospectus disclosures. Finding that the process complied with natural justice and that the conclusions were proportionate to the misconduct, the Court accepted the recommendation of removal from membership for five years in each matter, with the two periods to run separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>