https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458335 In an NDPS matter involving a commercial quantity, bail was refused under the restrictive statutory framework because the sampling objection and claim of false implication were treated as issues for trial rather than grounds for release at the bail stage. The Court relied on contemporaneous records and the fact that each packet had been tested before the contents were mixed for sampling, and it distinguished precedents on their facts, including cases involving partial analysis or a later evidentiary stage. On that basis, it found no reasonable ground to hold that the seizure or the proceedings were vitiated, and bail was declined. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2024 12:54:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458335 In an NDPS matter involving a commercial quantity, bail was refused under the restrictive statutory framework because the sampling objection and claim of false implication were treated as issues for trial rather than grounds for release at the bail stage. The Court relied on contemporaneous records and the fact that each packet had been tested before the contents were mixed for sampling, and it distinguished precedents on their facts, including cases involving partial analysis or a later evidentiary stage. On that basis, it found no reasonable ground to hold that the seizure or the proceedings were vitiated, and bail was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458335