<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1567 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458344</link>
    <description>Prolonged custody, the absence of known criminal antecedents, and the fact that the trial had not yet commenced justified release on bail, even though the charge had already been framed. The Supreme Court noted that the petitioners had remained in custody for about 2 years and 4 months and that the nature of the contraband also supported bail. Bail was granted, with the trial court left to impose appropriate conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:29:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1567 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458344</link>
      <description>Prolonged custody, the absence of known criminal antecedents, and the fact that the trial had not yet commenced justified release on bail, even though the charge had already been framed. The Supreme Court noted that the petitioners had remained in custody for about 2 years and 4 months and that the nature of the contraband also supported bail. Bail was granted, with the trial court left to impose appropriate conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>