<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1478 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458346</link>
    <description>A bail request under the NDPS Act was refused because the accused had remained in custody since April 2021 and was also implicated in another NDPS case. The SC considered the seriousness of the narcotics offences and the accused&#039;s involvement in a separate case under the same Act, and found no basis to exercise discretion in favour of bail. The special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:29:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1478 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458346</link>
      <description>A bail request under the NDPS Act was refused because the accused had remained in custody since April 2021 and was also implicated in another NDPS case. The SC considered the seriousness of the narcotics offences and the accused&#039;s involvement in a separate case under the same Act, and found no basis to exercise discretion in favour of bail. The special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>