https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458348 The Karnataka High Court held that an order of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Tax was liable to be set aside because the legal issue in the appeal was already covered by the Court's earlier decision in a connected matter. The appellant relied on that prior ruling under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and the respondent did not dispute the position. Applying the reasons already recorded in the earlier decision, the Court quashed the impugned order and allowed the appeal. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2024 17:03:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458348 The Karnataka High Court held that an order of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Tax was liable to be set aside because the legal issue in the appeal was already covered by the Court's earlier decision in a connected matter. The appellant relied on that prior ruling under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, and the respondent did not dispute the position. Applying the reasons already recorded in the earlier decision, the Court quashed the impugned order and allowed the appeal. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458348