<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1427 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458348</link>
    <description>The KHC allowed the appeal under Sec. 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, overturning the order dated 27.05.2016 by the Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Tax. The ruling was influenced by precedent set in the case of State of Karnataka Vs. Sri Rajesh Jain, favoring the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1427 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458348</link>
      <description>The KHC allowed the appeal under Sec. 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, overturning the order dated 27.05.2016 by the Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Tax. The ruling was influenced by precedent set in the case of State of Karnataka Vs. Sri Rajesh Jain, favoring the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>