https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458328 Regulation of a High Court's vacations and sittings was treated as part of the administration of justice under Article 225, so Parliament lacked competence to enact Section 23A of the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954; the provision was therefore ultra vires and the Presidential order made under it invalid. The application nevertheless failed because the challenge was procedurally defective: objections based on writ jurisdiction, missing necessary parties, territorial jurisdiction, and the form of relief were substantial, and no effective relief could be granted on the application as constituted. The applicants had sufficient legal interest, but that did not cure the jurisdictional and party-constitution defects. en-us Wed, 31 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:52:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458328 Regulation of a High Court's vacations and sittings was treated as part of the administration of justice under Article 225, so Parliament lacked competence to enact Section 23A of the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954; the provision was therefore ultra vires and the Presidential order made under it invalid. The application nevertheless failed because the challenge was procedurally defective: objections based on writ jurisdiction, missing necessary parties, territorial jurisdiction, and the form of relief were substantial, and no effective relief could be granted on the application as constituted. The applicants had sufficient legal interest, but that did not cure the jurisdictional and party-constitution defects. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458328