<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (12) TMI 52 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458327</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the petitions, affirming the constitutionality of the Punjab Security of Land Tenure Act. It upheld the State Legislature&#039;s competence under Entry 18 of List II and found the Act&#039;s provisions protected by Article 31A, thus immune from challenges under Articles 14, 19, and 31. The Act&#039;s restrictions were deemed reasonable, aligning with agrarian reform objectives and promoting small landownership.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=775051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (12) TMI 52 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458327</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the petitions, affirming the constitutionality of the Punjab Security of Land Tenure Act. It upheld the State Legislature&#039;s competence under Entry 18 of List II and found the Act&#039;s provisions protected by Article 31A, thus immune from challenges under Articles 14, 19, and 31. The Act&#039;s restrictions were deemed reasonable, aligning with agrarian reform objectives and promoting small landownership.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>