https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458325 The plaintiffs, claiming reversionary rights, challenged several conveyances executed by a widow. The court upheld the transactions of 30th March 1903 and 17th May 1906, finding legal necessity. The 12th August 1911 transaction was set aside, allowing plaintiffs recovery. The 6th February 1913 transaction was remanded for further review. No costs were awarded in the HC, and the cross-appeal was dismissed. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2024 15:30:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458325 The plaintiffs, claiming reversionary rights, challenged several conveyances executed by a widow. The court upheld the transactions of 30th March 1903 and 17th May 1906, finding legal necessity. The 12th August 1911 transaction was set aside, allowing plaintiffs recovery. The 6th February 1913 transaction was remanded for further review. No costs were awarded in the HC, and the cross-appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458325