Proven share purchase & demat existence, AO failed to refute evidence, assessee's company knowledge irrelevant if transactions valid.

Proven share purchase & demat existence, AO failed to refute evidence, assessee's company knowledge irrelevant if transactions valid. https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82468 Bogus share transactions involving abnormal price rise in penny stock shares - Assessee produced evidence of share purchase, existence in demat account - AO failed to rebut assessee's evidence, merely relied on circumstantial evidence - Ignorance of assessee about company's financials not crucial when transactions substantiated - Denial of exemption u/s 10(38) not justified - Addition u/s 68 deleted by CIT(A), upheld by ITAT - AO should have discharged onus after assessee's evidence. en-us Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:34:18 +0530 Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:34:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator Proven share purchase & demat existence, AO failed to refute evidence, assessee's company knowledge irrelevant if transactions valid. https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82468 Bogus share transactions involving abnormal price rise in penny stock shares - Assessee produced evidence of share purchase, existence in demat account - AO failed to rebut assessee's evidence, merely relied on circumstantial evidence - Ignorance of assessee about company's financials not crucial when transactions substantiated - Denial of exemption u/s 10(38) not justified - Addition u/s 68 deleted by CIT(A), upheld by ITAT - AO should have discharged onus after assessee's evidence. Highlights Income Tax Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:34:18 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82468