<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1076 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760477</link>
    <description>CESTAT Hyderabad remanded a gold confiscation case to the Original Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. The case involved foreign marked gold bars intercepted at Air Cargo Complex through courier companies. The tribunal found that both the Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) failed to adequately examine the appellant&#039;s defense claiming legitimate procurement and business transaction. The authorities passed cryptic orders without proper evaluation of evidence or following natural justice principles. The matter was remanded with directions to decide through a speaking order within three months, subject to appellant providing necessary documents and attending personal hearings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:34:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1076 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760477</link>
      <description>CESTAT Hyderabad remanded a gold confiscation case to the Original Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration. The case involved foreign marked gold bars intercepted at Air Cargo Complex through courier companies. The tribunal found that both the Original Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) failed to adequately examine the appellant&#039;s defense claiming legitimate procurement and business transaction. The authorities passed cryptic orders without proper evaluation of evidence or following natural justice principles. The matter was remanded with directions to decide through a speaking order within three months, subject to appellant providing necessary documents and attending personal hearings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>