<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1086 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760487</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the cash repayment was made by the successful bidder in an auction, not the assessee, thus not violating section 269T.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:34:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1086 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760487</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal concluded that the cash repayment was made by the successful bidder in an auction, not the assessee, thus not violating section 269T.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>