<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760513</link>
    <description>An appeal filed beyond the prescribed time was permitted to be received and decided on merits where the petitioner asserted later receipt of the order by e-mail and the delay beyond the condonable period was stated to be only about twenty days. In these facts and circumstances, the HC directed the appellate authority to entertain the appeal and dispose of it on merits, without examining limitation, subject to re-presentation within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1112 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760513</link>
      <description>An appeal filed beyond the prescribed time was permitted to be received and decided on merits where the petitioner asserted later receipt of the order by e-mail and the delay beyond the condonable period was stated to be only about twenty days. In these facts and circumstances, the HC directed the appellate authority to entertain the appeal and dispose of it on merits, without examining limitation, subject to re-presentation within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>