https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760515 The Kerala HC noted that the appellant had received a personal hearing before the adjudication order, the show-cause grounds were recorded, and the appellant admitted the relevant assessment records were available but had not been produced. As the order was passed nearly two weeks later, the court considered that the records could still have been furnished before adjudication. In those circumstances, the proper course was to pursue the statutory appeal under the Act against the adjudication order rather than seek writ intervention. The writ appeal was therefore dismissed as not fit for interference. en-us Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760515 The Kerala HC noted that the appellant had received a personal hearing before the adjudication order, the show-cause grounds were recorded, and the appellant admitted the relevant assessment records were available but had not been produced. As the order was passed nearly two weeks later, the court considered that the records could still have been furnished before adjudication. In those circumstances, the proper course was to pursue the statutory appeal under the Act against the adjudication order rather than seek writ intervention. The writ appeal was therefore dismissed as not fit for interference. Case-Laws GST Fri, 19 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760515