<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1478 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458314</link>
    <description>CESTAT Hyderabad held that Section 11B limitation under Central Excise Act does not apply to refund claims where service tax was paid under mistaken notion, even if amount was not legally payable. The case involved eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST and interest entitlement on refund from deposit date. Due to difference of opinion among members, matter was referred to Division Bench for final determination of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:02:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1478 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458314</link>
      <description>CESTAT Hyderabad held that Section 11B limitation under Central Excise Act does not apply to refund claims where service tax was paid under mistaken notion, even if amount was not legally payable. The case involved eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST and interest entitlement on refund from deposit date. Due to difference of opinion among members, matter was referred to Division Bench for final determination of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>