<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 977 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to brake shoes, confirming duty liability solely for cylinder heads for the normal period of 2009-10. The case was remanded to the Original Authority for quantification of duty liability, with instructions to complete this within two months and issue a refund for any excess deposit made by the appellant. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Tribunal providing clear directives for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 977 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to brake shoes, confirming duty liability solely for cylinder heads for the normal period of 2009-10. The case was remanded to the Original Authority for quantification of duty liability, with instructions to complete this within two months and issue a refund for any excess deposit made by the appellant. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the Tribunal providing clear directives for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>