<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 23 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38923</link>
    <description>Deductibility of payments to directors, salesmen and employees depended on strict proof that the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes and was commercially necessary; bare resolutions or unsupported assertions were insufficient where the underlying purpose and actual spending were not established. Commission to employees was deductible only if paid for services rendered and shown to be reasonable having regard to pay, service conditions, business profits and established trade practice. Excessive commission, absence of prior contractual entitlement, late-year payment and lack of supporting industry practice weighed against deduction. The claimed deductions were therefore disallowed on the stated statutory tests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 23 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38923</link>
      <description>Deductibility of payments to directors, salesmen and employees depended on strict proof that the expenditure was laid out wholly and exclusively for business purposes and was commercially necessary; bare resolutions or unsupported assertions were insufficient where the underlying purpose and actual spending were not established. Commission to employees was deductible only if paid for services rendered and shown to be reasonable having regard to pay, service conditions, business profits and established trade practice. Excessive commission, absence of prior contractual entitlement, late-year payment and lack of supporting industry practice weighed against deduction. The claimed deductions were therefore disallowed on the stated statutory tests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>