<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 987 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalty imposed under Sections 111(m) and 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, finding them inconsistent with statutory provisions. It ruled that the goods were correctly declared, and the exemption claim was not a mis-declaration. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 08:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 987 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalty imposed under Sections 111(m) and 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, finding them inconsistent with statutory provisions. It ruled that the goods were correctly declared, and the exemption claim was not a mis-declaration. The appeal was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>