https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760413 A writ petition was declined on maintainability because an alternative statutory appeal lay against the impugned order. The High Court noted that the petitioner had bypassed the appellate remedy provided by statute and had approached the writ court directly. As the dispute could be examined by the appropriate appellate authority, the Court exercised its discretion to refuse writ interference and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal in accordance with law. The Court expressly refrained from deciding the merits of the tax demand or the correctness of the impugned order. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760413 A writ petition was declined on maintainability because an alternative statutory appeal lay against the impugned order. The High Court noted that the petitioner had bypassed the appellate remedy provided by statute and had approached the writ court directly. As the dispute could be examined by the appropriate appellate authority, the Court exercised its discretion to refuse writ interference and directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal in accordance with law. The Court expressly refrained from deciding the merits of the tax demand or the correctness of the impugned order. Case-Laws GST Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760413