https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760416 A writ petition challenged the validity of notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the consequential demand and penalty order. The challenge to Section 16(4) was noted but not pursued at this stage. The Gauhati HC issued notice, allowed the respondents to file affidavits, and directed that the matter be listed with connected writ petitions on a later date. Pending the next hearing, the Court ordered that no coercive action be taken under the impugned order. en-us Wed, 17 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760416 A writ petition challenged the validity of notifications extending limitation under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the consequential demand and penalty order. The challenge to Section 16(4) was noted but not pursued at this stage. The Gauhati HC issued notice, allowed the respondents to file affidavits, and directed that the matter be listed with connected writ petitions on a later date. Pending the next hearing, the Court ordered that no coercive action be taken under the impugned order. Case-Laws GST Wed, 17 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760416