https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760421 Bail was granted to a CGST Act accused because continued pre-trial detention was unnecessary after completion of investigation and filing of the charge-sheet. The HC noted that the petitioner had been in judicial custody since 09.04.2024, the trial had not begun and was likely to take considerable time, the remaining evidence was electronic, and the balance of witnesses were official witnesses. On that basis, the Court found no sufficient ground to keep the petitioner in custody and released him subject to furnishing the prescribed bail bond and sureties, with conditions requiring appearance, non-offence, and non-interference with witnesses. en-us Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 10:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760421 Bail was granted to a CGST Act accused because continued pre-trial detention was unnecessary after completion of investigation and filing of the charge-sheet. The HC noted that the petitioner had been in judicial custody since 09.04.2024, the trial had not begun and was likely to take considerable time, the remaining evidence was electronic, and the balance of witnesses were official witnesses. On that basis, the Court found no sufficient ground to keep the petitioner in custody and released him subject to furnishing the prescribed bail bond and sureties, with conditions requiring appearance, non-offence, and non-interference with witnesses. Case-Laws GST Thu, 18 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760421