https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760427 A challenge to cancellation of GST registration was not entertained as the petitioner was directed to use the statutory revocation route instead. The petitioner was permitted to apply for revocation under Section 30 of the CGST Act within the stipulated time, subject to filing pending GST returns and paying outstanding tax and dues. The competent authority was directed to decide the revocation application in accordance with law within the prescribed period. The writ petition was therefore disposed of by requiring pursuit of the statutory remedy for restoration of registration. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 08:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760427 A challenge to cancellation of GST registration was not entertained as the petitioner was directed to use the statutory revocation route instead. The petitioner was permitted to apply for revocation under Section 30 of the CGST Act within the stipulated time, subject to filing pending GST returns and paying outstanding tax and dues. The competent authority was directed to decide the revocation application in accordance with law within the prescribed period. The writ petition was therefore disposed of by requiring pursuit of the statutory remedy for restoration of registration. Case-Laws GST Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760427