https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458301 Where a secured creditor proceeds under the SARFAESI Act in relation to secured assets, the availability of an efficacious statutory remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Sections 17 and 34 generally displaces writ jurisdiction. The article notes that, in a dispute involving rival title claims and competing sale deeds, the High Court declined to enter into the factual controversy or adjudicate title on merits, holding that such issues should be pursued before the DRT. The operative effect is that writ intervention was refused and the party was relegated to the statutory remedy. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Oct 2024 12:10:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458301 Where a secured creditor proceeds under the SARFAESI Act in relation to secured assets, the availability of an efficacious statutory remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Sections 17 and 34 generally displaces writ jurisdiction. The article notes that, in a dispute involving rival title claims and competing sale deeds, the High Court declined to enter into the factual controversy or adjudicate title on merits, holding that such issues should be pursued before the DRT. The operative effect is that writ intervention was refused and the party was relegated to the statutory remedy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=458301