<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Additions u/s 153A invalid without incriminating material; accountant&#039;s and director&#039;s statements insufficient evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82395</link>
    <description>Additions u/s 153A solely based on a sketchy statement of an accountant u/s 132(4), which in turn is based on a confessional statement of a director in a previous search, are impermissible. No incriminating material was discovered during the search in the assessee&#039;s case. The statement of the director in the previous search cannot be regarded as incriminating material found in the course of the assessee&#039;s search. Mere confessional statements without other material are unsustainable in law. In the absence of incriminating material found during the search, the legal foundation for making additions u/s 153A in unabated assessments does not exist, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Builwell Pvt. Ltd. and the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling in Pavitra Realcon Pvt. Ltd. and Anand Kumar Jain (HUF). Additions made u/s 153A are not permissible. The assessee&#039;s appeal is allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:28:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:28:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Additions u/s 153A invalid without incriminating material; accountant&#039;s and director&#039;s statements insufficient evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82395</link>
      <description>Additions u/s 153A solely based on a sketchy statement of an accountant u/s 132(4), which in turn is based on a confessional statement of a director in a previous search, are impermissible. No incriminating material was discovered during the search in the assessee&#039;s case. The statement of the director in the previous search cannot be regarded as incriminating material found in the course of the assessee&#039;s search. Mere confessional statements without other material are unsustainable in law. In the absence of incriminating material found during the search, the legal foundation for making additions u/s 153A in unabated assessments does not exist, as per the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in Pr. CIT vs. Abhisar Builwell Pvt. Ltd. and the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling in Pavitra Realcon Pvt. Ltd. and Anand Kumar Jain (HUF). Additions made u/s 153A are not permissible. The assessee&#039;s appeal is allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 08:28:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=82395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>