<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 905 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760306</link>
    <description>Under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, limitation runs from the date of the order, and a party seeking exclusion or extension must act diligently in applying for a certified copy within the prescribed time. The Tribunal treated the appellant&#039;s participation in the committee of creditors and email communications as sufficient to show knowledge of the proceedings, and held that a later application for the certified copy could not revive a period that had already expired before the Covid-19 suspension period began. Reliance on the Supreme Court&#039;s pandemic limitation orders and certified-copy decisions did not assist because the foundational limitation period had already lapsed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 905 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760306</link>
      <description>Under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, limitation runs from the date of the order, and a party seeking exclusion or extension must act diligently in applying for a certified copy within the prescribed time. The Tribunal treated the appellant&#039;s participation in the committee of creditors and email communications as sufficient to show knowledge of the proceedings, and held that a later application for the certified copy could not revive a period that had already expired before the Covid-19 suspension period began. Reliance on the Supreme Court&#039;s pandemic limitation orders and certified-copy decisions did not assist because the foundational limitation period had already lapsed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>