<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 938 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760339</link>
    <description>A GST assessment order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication because the petitioner was found to have a possible case on merits. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time as a condition for reconsideration. The quashed order was to be treated as an addendum to the show cause notice, and the petitioner was to be given an opportunity to reply and be heard before fresh orders were passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 938 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760339</link>
      <description>A GST assessment order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication because the petitioner was found to have a possible case on merits. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time as a condition for reconsideration. The quashed order was to be treated as an addendum to the show cause notice, and the petitioner was to be given an opportunity to reply and be heard before fresh orders were passed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>