https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760340 Non-response to GST portal notices led to an ex parte assessment, and the Madras High Court granted relief after finding the petitioner may have a case on merits. The Court declined to let delay, laches, and limitation under the GST appeal framework bar interference on the facts, and quashed the impugned assessment order. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, with the petitioner required to deposit 25% of the disputed tax and file a reply within the stipulated time, after which the respondent must give an opportunity of hearing and decide the matter afresh. en-us Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 10:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760340 Non-response to GST portal notices led to an ex parte assessment, and the Madras High Court granted relief after finding the petitioner may have a case on merits. The Court declined to let delay, laches, and limitation under the GST appeal framework bar interference on the facts, and quashed the impugned assessment order. The matter was remitted for fresh adjudication, with the petitioner required to deposit 25% of the disputed tax and file a reply within the stipulated time, after which the respondent must give an opportunity of hearing and decide the matter afresh. Case-Laws GST Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760340