<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 947 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760348</link>
    <description>HC ruled on ITC utilization challenge, setting aside the demand order for procedural defects. The court found the original order mechanically confirmed liability without specific findings on supplier tax payments. Matter was remanded to Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration, directing a detailed examination of tax compliance and providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard within eight weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 947 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760348</link>
      <description>HC ruled on ITC utilization challenge, setting aside the demand order for procedural defects. The court found the original order mechanically confirmed liability without specific findings on supplier tax payments. Matter was remanded to Adjudicating Authority for fresh consideration, directing a detailed examination of tax compliance and providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard within eight weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>