<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 950 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760351</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging GST appeal rejection. Despite procedural delays, the court found insufficient reasoning for tax liability determination. The appellate authority was directed to adjudicate the appeal on merits within eight weeks, with the tax demand stayed during appeal proceedings. The order was passed without imposing costs, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 950 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760351</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging GST appeal rejection. Despite procedural delays, the court found insufficient reasoning for tax liability determination. The appellate authority was directed to adjudicate the appeal on merits within eight weeks, with the tax demand stayed during appeal proceedings. The order was passed without imposing costs, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>