<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 952 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760353</link>
    <description>HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the tax recovery order. The court found a violation of natural justice under Section 75(4) of GST Act, as no personal hearing was provided. The impugned order was set aside, the matter remanded for reconsideration, and bank account attachment directed to be released. The 1st respondent was ordered to provide a personal hearing within 14 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 09:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 952 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760353</link>
      <description>HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the tax recovery order. The court found a violation of natural justice under Section 75(4) of GST Act, as no personal hearing was provided. The impugned order was set aside, the matter remanded for reconsideration, and bank account attachment directed to be released. The 1st respondent was ordered to provide a personal hearing within 14 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>