https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760355 An adjudicatory order passed without granting personal hearing was treated as contrary to natural justice and set aside, with the matter remanded for fresh consideration on merits after the petitioner filed reply or objection and paid 10% of the disputed tax amount. Because the underlying order was annulled, the bank attachment and account freezing could not continue and were directed to be lifted, subject to proof of the required payment. The operative effect was that coercive recovery measures fell away, while the tax demand itself remained open for reconsideration. en-us Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 May 2025 08:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760355 An adjudicatory order passed without granting personal hearing was treated as contrary to natural justice and set aside, with the matter remanded for fresh consideration on merits after the petitioner filed reply or objection and paid 10% of the disputed tax amount. Because the underlying order was annulled, the bank attachment and account freezing could not continue and were directed to be lifted, subject to proof of the required payment. The operative effect was that coercive recovery measures fell away, while the tax demand itself remained open for reconsideration. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760355