<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 958 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760359</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging GST ex-parte order. Court found petitioner failed to respond to show cause notices and did not exhaust statutory appeal remedy under Section 107. Order demanding tax liability was upheld due to alleged fraudulent input tax credit claims and supplier&#039;s suspended registration. Petitioner&#039;s natural justice arguments were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 958 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760359</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging GST ex-parte order. Court found petitioner failed to respond to show cause notices and did not exhaust statutory appeal remedy under Section 107. Order demanding tax liability was upheld due to alleged fraudulent input tax credit claims and supplier&#039;s suspended registration. Petitioner&#039;s natural justice arguments were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>