<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 962 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760363</link>
    <description>Where a refund was withheld only because transitional input tax credit under the CGST Act was disallowed, later allowance of that credit on remand removed the statutory basis for withholding. The withheld amount then became payable with applicable interest, and no fresh refund application was required. The text also notes that the amount was not part of the separately sanctioned refund, but was retained solely due to the earlier credit disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=774445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 962 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760363</link>
      <description>Where a refund was withheld only because transitional input tax credit under the CGST Act was disallowed, later allowance of that credit on remand removed the statutory basis for withholding. The withheld amount then became payable with applicable interest, and no fresh refund application was required. The text also notes that the amount was not part of the separately sanctioned refund, but was retained solely due to the earlier credit disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=760363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>