<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (2) TMI 11 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38888</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal canceled a penalty under section 271(1)(c)/274(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 imposed on an individual assessee for concealment of income. The Tribunal ruled that the mere addition of an unexplained cash credit does not warrant a penalty without independent proof of deliberate concealment. Citing the Supreme Court case Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anwar Ali, the Tribunal emphasized the need for such proof. The Tribunal did not address the applicability of the Explanation to section 271(1)(c), leading to the court ruling in favor of the assessee due to the lack of proper consideration of the Explanation, awarding costs of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:08:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (2) TMI 11 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38888</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal canceled a penalty under section 271(1)(c)/274(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 imposed on an individual assessee for concealment of income. The Tribunal ruled that the mere addition of an unexplained cash credit does not warrant a penalty without independent proof of deliberate concealment. Citing the Supreme Court case Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anwar Ali, the Tribunal emphasized the need for such proof. The Tribunal did not address the applicability of the Explanation to section 271(1)(c), leading to the court ruling in favor of the assessee due to the lack of proper consideration of the Explanation, awarding costs of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>