<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (2) TMI 8 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38878</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the reconstitution of the partnership firm post the death of a partner constituted a case of succession under section 188 of the Income-tax Act. The Court held that the formation of a new firm after the dissolution of the old one required separate assessments, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument that it was merely a change in the old firm&#039;s constitution. The decision aligned with a previous Full Bench ruling, leading to no costs but an assessed counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 200.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:24:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (2) TMI 8 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38878</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the reconstitution of the partnership firm post the death of a partner constituted a case of succession under section 188 of the Income-tax Act. The Court held that the formation of a new firm after the dissolution of the old one required separate assessments, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument that it was merely a change in the old firm&#039;s constitution. The decision aligned with a previous Full Bench ruling, leading to no costs but an assessed counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 200.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>