https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38869 The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that they were entitled to the status of a Hindu undivided family. The court found that there was no evidence to suggest the incapability of adding a new coparcener to the family, overturning the Tribunal's initial finding. As a result, the question of including interest earned by the minor sons was not relevant. The court did not address the issue of proving capability to add a new coparcener, deeming it academic, and declined to entertain the challenge to the validity of the family constituted by the assessee with his widowed mother and unmarried daughter. No costs were awarded in the matter. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:50:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38869 The court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that they were entitled to the status of a Hindu undivided family. The court found that there was no evidence to suggest the incapability of adding a new coparcener to the family, overturning the Tribunal's initial finding. As a result, the question of including interest earned by the minor sons was not relevant. The court did not address the issue of proving capability to add a new coparcener, deeming it academic, and declined to entertain the challenge to the validity of the family constituted by the assessee with his widowed mother and unmarried daughter. No costs were awarded in the matter. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 01 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38869