<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (11) TMI 59 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38868</link>
    <description>Dividend equalisation reserve was treated as a reserve, not a provision, for capital computation under the super profits tax or surtax framework. The statutory scheme and balance-sheet classification under the Companies Act distinguished reserves, being appropriations of profits kept for future use, from provisions made for known liabilities, contingencies, or commitments. Applying that commercial-accountancy distinction and Supreme Court authority, the amount credited to dividend equalisation reserve was not a charge against profits for a known liability. It was therefore includible in the capital computation for the relevant tax assessments in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:46:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=77414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (11) TMI 59 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38868</link>
      <description>Dividend equalisation reserve was treated as a reserve, not a provision, for capital computation under the super profits tax or surtax framework. The statutory scheme and balance-sheet classification under the Companies Act distinguished reserves, being appropriations of profits kept for future use, from provisions made for known liabilities, contingencies, or commitments. Applying that commercial-accountancy distinction and Supreme Court authority, the amount credited to dividend equalisation reserve was not a charge against profits for a known liability. It was therefore includible in the capital computation for the relevant tax assessments in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=38868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>